Posts filed under ‘republican’
Yesterday, I was watching Countdown and there was a discussion that the right-wing is going nuts. The guys at the Corner at the National Review are calm and rational right now. The National Review is a intellectual conservative journal that I read sometimes.
However, this blog is over the top and even makes Glen Beck and Bill O’Reilly look rational. Here is the excerpt
“Another traitorous attack on behalf of the seditious administration. The military is the enemy. He needs to demonize America’s much loved military. Destroy their reputation. It’s what the leftists do. It’s how they destroy the enemy. DISINFORMATION (Soviets were brilliant at this, as are the current EU statist thugs and their tools).
The Mohammedan president is going to gin up his constituency across the world while deploying our troops in a nonsensical military strategy in Afghanistan. Do you see what he is doing? He is going to decimate the military. The left did this in the 60s. They demonized the war and our troops along with it. This time, they demonized this war, but it did not work in besmirching our beloved soldiers. So now they have to make them look bad.
BRING HOME THE TROOPS!
Save our boys from a jihad sympathizing president. I said this in a previous thread — Obama wants trials. Obama wants to divert attention from his coup on the Constitution. Dear leader wants to control the images, the news you hear. He needs to distract the American people while he destroys America. They do not want tea parties, they do not want cognizance. They do not want you to think about what they are doing. Show trials. It is very much like terrorists who start a fire to distract first responders, so they can set off a bomb somewhere else.
Obama and his traitors will “start a fire” and hypnotize the American people with torture! cruelty! and put Bushchimphitler policy on trial with a special prosecutor, of course, while they overthrow the constitution, capitalism, freedom of speech, and enact gun control. That is what is happen”
This guy needs to sit down with a shrink and explain his delusional paranoia to a master psychologist. They have a delusional belief that Obama is going to take their guns and do all kinds of other horrible things. I just do not understand why these people have to resort to delusional beliefs just becaues a Dem won and he is a black man.
Do you have any explainations? Right now, I am loss for words over this paranoia.
Here is another Republican Congressman that decided to open his mouth (http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2Flinkto%2Fticker.html).
“Liberals hate real Americans that work and achieve and believe in God.”
Why would you make a stupid remark like that? What motivates such ignorance? This man has directly insulted me. I like real americans that work hard and I am friends with several conservative Christians.
This one of the clearest example of moronic stereotyping that I have seen in this election. This guy should be not be reelected because this remark shows that he has poor judgment.
Here is a excerpt from a blog from Boarshead (http://www.boarsheadtavern.com/archives/2008/10/01/1164941.html),
bama is one of those “teflon” people that nothing sticks to. Radical, leftist past? Bill Ayers? Jeremiah Wright? Franklin Raines? The Action Wire? Legal bullying in Missouri? Some how, none of that matters at all. Maybe it’s because Obama’s been so successful at generating an image of himself as the sort of person who really wouldn’t get his hands dirty, and image is so much more powerful than fact. Or it could be the media not going hardball on those things. I don’t know, but either way, he’s made of teflon, so much so that even BHTers are praising him for being above the fray.
He’s the ultimate chameleon. Bill Clinton was quite gifted at saying whatever the people in front of him wanted to hear, and I see this same knack for public rhetoric in Obama.
I am not going to delve into his post except I do want to critique his point on Ayers and Wright. The conservatives are overblowing the connection between Ayers and Wright. People like that paint the image that Obama is some type of socialist based on these connections.
People who use the subject reasoning have a poor case. Mr. Wright and Mr. Ayers are not policy advisiers and have little to do with how Obama shapes his policy position. Criticism of he choose as his advisers is much stronger arguement but to suggest that Obama is a some radical just because he associates with Mr. Ayers and Mr. Wright is a weak position and voters who believe in the subject line of reasoning are decieved by conservatives. I consider this to be Republican propaganda and therefore, should not be used as a reason for voting aganist Obama.